Influencer Marketing StrategyCreator selection, vetting and briefs · Lesson 4 of 15

Finding and vetting creators

Article · 12 min · 8 min lecture

Video lecture

Finding and vetting creators with first-party data

11 chapters · about 8 min · full transcript

Coming soon

Chapter 1 of 11

Finding and vetting creators

  • Big numbers can hide the wrong audience
  • Four-part vetting framework
  • Written scorecard + red flags

The narrated lecture is in production

Every chapter is scripted and ready. Browse the chapters and read the full transcript now — the video will appear here when it’s published.

Chapters

Where to find creators

  • Your own community: customers, followers and people already tagging your brand, often the most authentic partners.
  • Platform marketplaces (where available in your market): TikTok One, which includes the TikTok Creator Marketplace; the Instagram Creator Marketplace inside Meta's tools; and YouTube BrandConnect (Creator Partnerships in YouTube Studio, open to eligible YouTube Partner Program creators in supported countries). These give first-party audience data with the creator's permission. Availability differs by country for both brands and creators, so check the official pages.
  • Discovery tools: third-party platforms that search creators by niche, location and audience data.
  • Hashtag and keyword search on each platform, including Arabic, Urdu and other local-language terms.
  • Agencies and talent managers, especially for macro and celebrity creators.
  • Competitor and adjacent brand partnerships, to see who already works in your category and check exclusivity.
  • Regulator registers where they exist, for example checking that a UAE creator displays a Media Council advertiser permit number.

The vetting framework: FIT, TRUST, PERFORMANCE, SAFETY

1. Fit

  • Does the audience match your target (location, age, gender, language, interests)? Ask for screenshots or exports of native analytics (audience demographics, reach, views) rather than relying on public follower counts.
  • Does the creator's content style and values align with your brand?
  • Would their audience find a partnership with you natural?

2. Trust and authenticity Signs of inauthentic audiences or engagement:

  • Sudden follower spikes without a viral post or media appearance to explain them.
  • Engagement that is very low compared with followers, or suspiciously high with generic comments ("Nice pic!", emoji-only comments from unrelated accounts).
  • Audience mostly in countries unrelated to the creator's content or language.
  • Views that do not match engagement or comments that do not relate to the content.

Use discovery tools' audience quality indicators as a signal, but verify with native analytics and your own review.

3. Performance

  • Typical reach and views per post (median rather than average, to reduce the effect of one viral hit).
  • Engagement quality: comments that show genuine conversation, questions and saves/shares.
  • Past sponsored content: does it perform close to their organic content, or much worse?
  • If available and shared with permission: past campaign results (clicks, codes, sales).

4. Brand safety

  • Review several months of content, including Stories highlights, older posts and comments.
  • Look for offensive language, discriminatory content, misinformation, risky stunts, undisclosed ads or controversial associations.
  • Check how they handle criticism and negative comments.
  • Check competitor partnerships and exclusivity conflicts.
  • Confirm required licenses (for example advertiser licenses or permits in the UAE and Saudi Arabia).

Engagement rate: calculate it consistently

A common formula is:

Engagement rate by followers = (Likes + Comments + Shares + Saves) ÷ Followers × 100

For short-video platforms, many marketers prefer engagement rate by views = engagements ÷ views × 100, because reach is driven more by recommendation than by followers. Be consistent within a comparison and compare creators on the same platform and in similar niches. Treat any generic "good engagement rate" benchmark with caution.

Vetting scorecard (example)

CriterionWeightCreator ACreator B
Audience fit (verified analytics)30%4/55/5
Content quality and style fit20%5/53/5
Authenticity signals20%5/53/5
Performance (median views, engagement quality)20%3/54/5
Brand safety10%5/54/5

Score, discuss and document. A written scorecard prevents "we picked them because the founder likes their feed".

Worked example

A Dubai-based fitness supplement brand shortlists 10 creators. Native analytics show one creator's audience is only 12% in the GCC despite being Dubai-based; another had a follower spike of 80,000 in a week with no viral post and low comment quality. Both are removed. A third has great fit but promoted a banned supplement brand two years ago; the team discusses it with the creator, who explains the change of stance publicly. The team decides case by case and records the reasoning.

Hands-on: data request and red-flag checklist

DATA REQUEST (send after first positive reply)
Please share screenshots or exports from native analytics:
1. Audience: top countries and cities, age and gender split (last 30 days)
2. Reach/views for your last 10 posts of the format we're discussing
3. Two recent sponsored posts with reach, views, link clicks
4. Any licenses/permits held (e.g. UAE advertiser permit, KSA Mawthooq)
5. Current exclusivities or brand conflicts in our category
RED FLAGS
[ ] Follower spike without a viral post or press moment
[ ] Audience countries unrelated to language or content
[ ] Generic or emoji-only comments from unrelated accounts
[ ] Views far below what the follower count suggests
[ ] Sponsored posts consistently far weaker than organic
[ ] Undisclosed ads in recent history
[ ] Refuses to share native analytics

Buying followers or views is not just a performance problem. The FTC's rule on consumer reviews and testimonials (in force since October 2024) prohibits selling or buying fake indicators of social media influence, such as bot followers or views, for commercial purposes.

Common mistakes

  • Relying on follower counts and public screenshots.
  • Using average views skewed by a single viral video.
  • Skipping content history reviews.
  • Ignoring licensing requirements in regulated markets.

Key takeaways

  • Source creators from your community, platform marketplaces, discovery tools, search and agencies.
  • Vet for fit, trust and authenticity, performance and brand safety using native analytics.
  • Watch for fake-follower signs: unexplained spikes, mismatched audience locations and generic comments.
  • Calculate engagement rate consistently (by followers or by views) and use a written scorecard.

Check your understanding

Quick questions to lock in the lesson. They don’t count towards your certificate.

  1. Why ask creators for native analytics screenshots or exports?
  2. Which is a warning sign of inauthentic followers?
  3. Why use median rather than average views when assessing creators?

Put it into practice

Create a vetting scorecard for your next campaign and score three real creators in your niche using publicly available information, noting what you would ask them to verify.

Enrol for free to save your progress

Reading is always free. Enrol to keep your place, take the final assessment and earn a verifiable certificate.